Bullying and Harassment in Somersworth Schools

Notice and Demand:

To Somersworth, New Hampshire Mayor, and Chief of Police

Presented by william-dexter [Miller]

June 28, 2012

I have been forced to investigate the activities of the Somersworth Police Department, due to the extreme, unwarranted harassment against me, by Somersworth police officers, in two routine traffic stops, one entirely unwarranted, within about five months, last year, for which there will be a lawsuit.

The only question is how many people will join me in a multi-party suit, over a complex of issues surrounding failures of duty/violations of fiduciary trust to the public, resulting in failure to resolve issues of extreme bullying, sexual and other harassment, and assaults and battery, in the Somersworth schools, reported to me by the parents of three different youths, all domiciled within a few blocks radius, that I have spoken with thus far, in Somersworth. I am certain there will be others.

In addition, as is presented in my blog, Harassment by Somersworth Police, on http://william-miller.blogspot.com, one woman has reported misprison of felony, harassment, and false arrest and prosecution, by the Somersworth police.

That woman, geneva-irene [Mills], is one parent whose daughter was ruthlessly harassed and assaulted, and now suffers social anxiety disorder, having dropped out of the Somersworth school system, a few months ago, while in the ninth grade, since the Somersworth school administration, and the Somersworth police, refuse to take action on these matters, as is the case with the other two children whose parents reported such harassment to me.

Clearly there is a pattern here. Failure to act within the lawful scope of one's duty to the public, constitutes a serious fiduciary trust violation, which is fraud, a serious crime. As Sheriff, I intend to prosecute such crimes vigorously, until such fraudulent activities cease.


william-dexter [Miller], a free and sovereign inhabitant upon the land of Strafford County.


Affidavit of Truth and Fact

Presented to the Somersworth Mayor, and Chief of Police, by geneva-irene [Mills],

June 28, 2012

The following presentation regarding acts of harassment, bullying and assaults and battery against my teenage daughter, in the Somersworth Junior High School and High School, and the failures of school administrators and the Somersworth police to act upon these incidents, is true and correct, as reported to me, by my daughter, and witnessed by me, in my dealings with the aforesaid public officials.

A copy of this document will be mailed to New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney, Sheriff Wayne Estes, united States Postmaster General, and federal Marshal Donald Alfred Love-Boltz.

A lawsuit will soon be filed in these matters, and the only question in this regard, is whether Sheriff Estes, Attorney General Delaney, and other public officials will also be named as defendants, alongside the various school system officials and the Somersworth Chief of Police.

Approximately six or more years ago, in sixth grade, my daughter began to be harassed by a group of older students. I reported this matter to the middle school principal, and nothing was done.

This situation continued right until the time my daughter, now sixteen, dropped out of ninth grade, (having been held back a year due to these events), several months ago.

I have spoken to several middle school and high school principals and the SAU administrator, and nothing was ever done.

In eighth grade, three years ago, my daughter was physically assaulted by older teenage boys, who were harassing and bullying her, in conjunction with other, older girls. I reported these occurrences to the Somersworth police, and nothing was ever done.

I affirm the above stated facts, as true and correct.

This document is notarized for authentication only, and not to imply any contract with the corporation-state, whatsoever.

geneva-irene [Mills], a free and sovereign inhabitant upon the land of Strafford County

Harassment by Somersworth Police

Notice and Demand/Cease and Desist Presented to Somersworth New Hampshire Chief of Police Dean Crombie, and Director of Motor Vehicles Virginia C. Beecher By geneva-irene [Mills] June 28, 2012 Notice and Demand is hereby given that YOU will cease and desist in your un-Constitutional policies and procedures against me, resulting in false arrest, misprison of felony assault and battery committed against me, denial of medical attention after said assault and battery, false DWI charge and false suspension of driver’s license. There will be a federal lawsuit for harassment and deprivations of rights, forthrightly, and this document will be posted as a blog on http://william-miller.blogspot.com. William Miller is a candidate for Sheriff of Strafford County, who has pledged to investigate these matters, and prosecute for misprision of felony, upon taking office as Sheriff. A copy of this document will be mailed to each of the following: New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney, Strafford County Sheriff Wayne Estes, William Miller, the united States Postmaster General, the Somersworth mayor, and federal Marshal Donald Alfred Love-Boltz. On May 30, at approximately 2000 hours, I was subjected to assault and battery, and attempted robbery, by a woman whose first name is Anne, and two male accomplices, while I was walking to my car, parked on Washington St . I was attempting to escape, having been beaten bloody, and having called 911, and was able to get into my car and drive away. I happen to have become aware that this woman, Anne, was arrested the same night by the Somersworth police, for another assault on a friend of mine, Christa Pinkerton. As I was traveling to my house, about two blocks from where the incident occurred, and the same distance from my house, the Somersworth police, including Officer Neal Pawlik, pulled me over en route to my house. I was arrested for DWI, having been required to take the breath analysis test three times. I repeatedly requested transportation to the hospital and the police refused. They also refused to go back to the scene of the assault and investigate, which constitutes misprision of felony, itself a felony on the part of the responding officers. Officer Pawlik admitted approximately two weeks later, that he had never gone back to investigate the incident, when I completed a statement regarding the incident. I had been fleeing for my life, having barely escaped three assailants, and called 911, and I was the only one arrested that night, and my automobile towed, even though it was parked in a safe location, in a parking spot, costing me $100 for towing, which I demand be remunerated to me within ten days. I spoke with the assistant town manager for Somersworth, on approximately May 31, 2012, and he suggested that I speak with a police captain, which I did the following day. Captain Timmons proceeded to harass me on the telephone, falsely stating that I had made a statement to the police that night, indicating that I owed some money to someone named Leo, whom I have never heard of, and that I had stated that the woman punched me in the mouth, and that was the extent of the assault, at which point I, apparently quite casually, drove away. That is entirely false, a pure fabrication on the part of Captain Timmons, who stated “The DWI will stick.” Therefore, Captain Timmons is guilty of fraud, false arrest and prosecution, and misprision of felony, as well. I called the Division of Motor Vehicles today, speaking with a woman named Sarah, regarding two bogus tickets, one for parking illegally, and one for running a red light, which I will explain momentarily, and which are part of a campaign of harassment against me, by the Somersworth police, and the Somersworth Housing Authority police. Sarah then informed me that my driver’s license would be suspended as of midnight tonight, due to the bogus DWI. Officer Pawlik had informed me that the suspension would not take effect until June 29, 2012. Had I continued to exercise my right to travel after today, then this would render me susceptible to being arrested for driving after suspension, and I believe that that is part of an organized plan against me. For example, in reference to the two tickets that I had called the DMV to discuss: On approximately June 12, 2012, I was traveling through a traffic light, and the light turned yellow as I was clearing the far side of the intersection. There was a police cruiser on my left as I was traveling through the intersection. Another automobile was traveling behind me, and the police cruiser turned left behind that automobile. I noticed the cruiser lights on, which is unlawful, as these are emergency lights, and clearly, there was no emergency. I pulled over on the right side, as did the automobile behind me. The police officer in the cruiser bypassed the automobile behind mine, which had, obviously, gone through the intersection and light after I did, and that officer proceeded to ticket me for running a red light, in a clear example of selective prosecution, harassment and deprivation of right to due process of law. In regard to the parking ticket: I attempted to park in my usual handicapped-designated space outside my apartment in Somersworth Housing, which was occupied by an automobile that had no handicap designation. That driver was not ticketed. Instead, I was ticketed for parking in another handicapped-designated space outside my apartment, for parking in an unassigned parking space. I have a document from Somersworth Housing Authority, stating that there are no assigned parking spaces. Once again, this is an example of selective prosecution, in a campaign of harassment and deprivation of rights. I am now aware that Rod Class, a candidate for President and private attorney general from North Carolina, has proven, in the North Carolina Supreme Court, that “driving” in a “vehicle” means transporting passengers or commercial goods, in commerce, thereby requiring a “driver’s license,” and, according to US and New Hampshire Department of Transportation regulations, exercising one’s right to travel, in one’s own private automobile, for private, non-commercial purposes, does not require a driver’s license . This confirms, once again, the fact, already proven in a plethora of court cases, including several, at least, in the US Supreme Court, that free and unlicensed travel, in private, upon the roads of the state and nation, is a right, and not a privilege. In the event that I am subjected to this “suspension,” it is my intention to continue to exercise this right to travel, and I am prepared to bring suit on this matter, all the way to The Supreme Court if necessary. I will no longer be harassed, interfered with and extorted from, in an organized campaign, conducted by thugs, acting under color of law and authority. I will soon be crafting the necessary documents in apprisal, regarding my sovereign status and right to travel. YOU are hereby noticed. YOU are hereby ordered to cease and desist, in any and all further efforts to harass me, and to search for excuses to selectively prosecute me. Lawfully ordered by a free and sovereign inhabitant upon the land of Strafford County, geneva-irene [Mills]  with the corporation-state, whatsoever.

Revolution in Iceland

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave..

Right?

The people of Iceland have succeeded in a revolution against the globalist cartel, the Illuminati.

What is wrong with YOU?  Still waiting for THEIR puppet, Obama, to fix the problems THEY have engineered?

Check out this encouraging article.

GLOBAL ELITES THROWN OUT OF ICELAND: Iceland Dismantles Corrupt Gov’t Then Arrests All Rothschild Bankers

by Reena on June 20, 2012 · 2 comments

This is way too good news. This is exactly what we the people in other elite-controlled countries need to do. We need a big enough NO. I wonder when enough people will feel ‘enough is enough,’ like the Icelandic people felt, in order to be able to see through such a pivotal turnaround in power – the power of the people. But denial and narcissism are not eternal. The change train is getting faster.

~~ Start ~~

GLOBAL ELITES THROWN OUT OF ICELAND: Iceland Dismantles Corrupt Gov’t Then Arrests All Rothschild Bankers – 19th June 2012

It Makes Sense – by The Meister Since the 1900?s the vast majority of the American population has dreamed about saying “NO” to the Unconstitutional, corrupt, Rothschild/Rockefeller banking criminals, but no one has dared to do so. Why? If just half of our Nation, and the “1%”, who pay the majority of the taxes, just said NO MORE! Our Gov’t would literally change over night.

Why is it so hard, for some people to understand, that by simply NOT giving your money, to large Corporations, who then send jobs, Intellectual Property, etc. offshore and promote anti-Constitutional rights… You will accomplish more, than if you used violence.

In other words… RESEARCH WHERE YOU ARE SENDING EVERY SINGLE PENNY!!! Is that so hard? The truth of the matter is… No one, except the Icelanders, have to been the only culture on the planet to carry out this successfully. Not only have they been successful, at overthrowing the corrupt Gov’t, they’ve drafted a Constitution, that will stop this from happening ever again.

That’s not the best part… The best part, is that they have arrested ALL Rothschild/Rockefeller banking puppets, responsible for the Country’s economic Chaos and meltdown.

Last week 9 people were arrested in London and Reykjavik for their possible responsibility for Iceland’s financial collapse in 2008, a deep crisis which developed into an unprecedented public reaction that is changing the country’s direction.

It has been a revolution without weapons in Iceland, the country that hosts the world’s oldest democracy (since 930), and whose citizens have managed to effect change by going on demonstrations and banging pots and pans. Why have the rest of the Western countries not even heard about it?

Pressure from Icelandic citizens’ has managed not only to bring down a government, but also begin the drafting of a new constitution (in process) and is seeking to put in jail those bankers responsible for the financial crisis in the country. As the saying goes, if you ask for things politely it is much easier to get them.

This quiet revolutionary process has its origins in 2008 when the Icelandic government decided to nationalise the three largest banks, Landsbanki, Kaupthing and Glitnir, whose clients were mainly British, and North and South American.

After the State took over, the official currency (krona) plummeted and the stock market suspended its activity after a 76% collapse. Iceland was becoming bankrupt and to save the situation, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) injected U.S. $ 2,100 million and the Nordic countries helped with another 2,500 million.

Great little victories of ordinary people.

While banks and local and foreign authorities were desperately seeking economic solutions, the Icelandic people took to the streets and their persistent daily demonstrations outside parliament in Reykjavik prompted the resignation of the conservative Prime Minister Geir H. Haarde and his entire government.

Citizens demanded, in addition, to convene early elections, and they succeeded. In April a coalition government was elected, formed by the Social Democratic Alliance and the Left Green Movement, headed by a new Prime Minister, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir.

Throughout 2009 the Icelandic economy continued to be in a precarious situation (at the end of the year the GDP had dropped by 7%) but, despite this, the Parliament proposed to repay the debt to Britain and the Netherlands with a payment of 3,500 million Euros, a sum to be paid every month by Icelandic families for 15 years at 5.5% interest.

The move sparked anger again in the Icelanders, who returned to the streets demanding that, at least, that decision was put to a referendum. Another big small victory for the street protests: in March 2010 that vote was held and an overwhelming 93% of the population refused to repay the debt, at least with those conditions.

This forced the creditors to rethink the deal and improve it, offering 3% interest and payment over 37 years. Not even that was enough. The current president, on seeing that Parliament approved the agreement by a narrow margin, decided last month not to approve it and to call on the Icelandic people to vote in a referendum so that they would have the last word.

The bankers are fleeing in fear.

Returning to the tense situation in 2010, while the Icelanders were refusing to pay a debt incurred by financial sharks without consultation, the coalition government had launched an investigation to determine legal responsibilities for the fatal economic crisis and had already arrested several bankers and top executives closely linked to high risk operations.

Interpol, meanwhile, had issued an international arrest warrant against Sigurdur Einarsson, former president of one of the banks. This situation led scared bankers and executives to leave the country en masse.

In this context of crisis, an assembly was elected to draft a new constitution that would reflect the lessons learned and replace the current one, inspired by the Danish constitution.

To do this, instead of calling experts and politicians, Iceland decided to appeal directly to the people, after all they have sovereign power over the law. More than 500 Icelanders presented themselves as candidates to participate in this exercise in direct democracy and write a new constitution. 25 of them, without party affiliations, including lawyers, students, journalists, farmers and trade union representatives were elected.

Among other developments, this constitution will call for the protection, like no other, of freedom of information and expression in the so-called Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, in a bill that aims to make the country a safe haven for investigative journalism and freedom of information, where sources, journalists and Internet providers that host news reporting are protected.

The people, for once, will decide the future of the country while bankers and politicians witness the transformation of a nation from the sidelines.

~~ End ~~

A previous post: Iceland forgives mortgage

Monsanto Protection Act

The bulletin following this one came to me from Jeanne Ingress, a candidate for the US Congress, and a friend of mine, who also sent me the information on the Postmaster General of North America, which I strongly suggest you look into, if you want your rights and your freedom back.

Monsanto owns fifty different companies, including Coke, Pepsi, Aunt Jemima, basically everything that has anything to do with bio-engineered wheat products and high fructose corn syrup.

The massive overconsumption of these prodeucts is driving all of the metabolic disasters that lead to so many illnesses that could be prevented, and never mind Obamacare.  (See http://www.baye.com/, check out links to paleolithic nutrition).

In addition, due to the high water consumption for the irrigation of these crops, the Oglala Aquifer, under the midwest states, will be drained down to five percent, by the year 2020.  This is a society killer, an absolute disaster of epic proportions, when we find ourselves in the middle of another dust bowl, that we do not have the water left to irrigate our way out of, perhaps on top of a depression far worse and longer lasting than that of the thirties (ref: http://www.endofthedollar.com/, http://www.endofamerica15.com/).  

The dust bowl of the thirties, obviously, came immediately on the heels of the Depression.  What was that about history being repeated due to mankind's inability to learn from the lessons of the past?

Has Obama, Romney, or any other politician you know, said a doggone word, ever, about the hyper-reliance upon bio-engineered grain agriculture, what it is doing to the human metabolism and our health care system, or the coming dustbowl due to the draining of the Oglala Aquifer?

Of course not.  Why?

Obama, Romney, the Clintons, Bushes, Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, and a long laundry list of international power players--media figures, financiers, corporate executives, and politicians--are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and/or it's sister organization, the Trilateral Commission (the force behind the large scale water diversion projects, such as the North American Water and Power Association, that I was writing about in 1993, as a student at UNH).

Since 1919, members of the Council on Foreign Relations have been calling for "an end run around national sovereignty, in pursuit of a New World Order."

David Rockefeller, (Chase Manhattan, Citibank, Exxon, Mobil, Standard Oil, etc...), founder of the Trilateral Commission, has been widely quoted as saying that he has an agenda to undermine the United States in pursuit of a Trilateralist world government.

The Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission are funded by Monsanto, Archer Daniels Midland ("bread basket to the world"), Alcoa (Aluminum smelting, the source of all the flouridation of the water), British Petroleum, AFL-CIO (the unions that Obama is beholden to), Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Shearson-Lehman, the list goes on and on.

These operators own the corporate media.

These operators use their charade of Republican vs. Democrat, to divide YOU and smokescreeen away the truth.

For over twenty years, since I first ran for the legislature as a Republican (later, in 1996, as a Libertarian), I have spoken and written too many times, to no apparent avail, to warn YOU, of what is in store for YOU, with this business about a New World Order.

Henry Kissinger acts as a prelate to presidents (Republican and Democrat) on behalf of the international bankers (Rothschilds, Warburgs, Rockefellers, Harrimans, DuPonts....)

I dare you to Google: Kissinger/food as a weapon, Agenda 21/food as a weapon, Club of Rome/food as a weapon.

These operators have plans for YOU.

As Sheriff of Strafford County, I will be here to defend YOU, your rights, freedom and your country.

The same is true of Congressional candidate Jeanne Ingress and Presidential candidate Rod Class.

Ref: my blog, Obama's Supercongress, Newstates Constitution, Comprehensive Hi-jacking...

Take action today to stop the Monsanto Protection Act!

Tell your member of Congress: "Vote for Americans' Rights not Corporations!" 

URGENT: Stop the Monsanto Protection Act today!
Dear Jeanne

Last week the Senate passed its version of the Farm Bill by a vote of 64 to 35. Despite the hard won battles by Food Democracy Now! and our allies, the bill’s passage is another sad reminder that our elected officials in Washington, DC are continuing to place the interests of corporate lobbyists over the wellbeing of the American people.

Nowhere was that more evident than the vote against the Sanders’ “Consumers Right to Know About Genetically Engineered Food Act” (amendment S. 2310) that would have clarified state’s rights to label genetically engineered foods. Rather than stand up for the rights of Americans, 73 U.S. Senators chose to vote against your basic Right to Know what’s in your food.

Today the assault on our rights continues in the House of Representatives, where a provision was added to the House Agricultural Appropriations Bill that would strip federal courts of their authority to halt the sale and planting of an illegal and potentially hazardous GMO crop. This new provision, called a “rider”, would allow biotech companies to continue to sell their unapproved seeds to farmers, who could plant them while important legal appeals are taking place, instead of halting the planting of the unapproved crop until the court settled the appeal as has been done up until now.

In classic form, the biotech industry has cleverly hidden their toxic plan under the deceptive title of a “Farmer Assurance Provision” (Sec. 733). In truth, the language in this provision is nothing short of a “Monsanto Protection Act” that would allow this company to continue to flout American legal precedence and violate the constitutional separation of powers set forth by our Founding Fathers.

In short, the “Farm Assurance Provision” is the greatest threat to farmers’ and citizens’ rights that Monsanto and the biotech industry has ever devised and it must be stopped - today!

This provision is being debated this week in the House of Representatives and we need your help today. Click here to stop the Monsanto Protection Act and tell your member of Congress to stand up for your rights and the Constitution!
http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/go/607?t=8&akid=583.182374.mPrMQC

According to legal advocates at the Center for Food Safety, this provision “would create a precedent-setting limitation on judicial review” and is a “dangerous assault on fundamental federal and judicial safeguards”.

This current rider is a response to the successful lawsuits that farmers and groups like Center for Food Safety have filed on preventing the sale, distribution and cultivation of GMO sugarbeets and GMO alfalfa, both of which were forced to stop from being planted while the USDA finalized full environment reviews. But once again, Monsanto and the biotech industry are working behind the scenes to shred vital legal rights simply so they can make endless profits.

If allowed to pass, the Monsanto Protection Act would:

• Violate the constitutional precedent of separation of powers by interfering with the process of judicial review.
• Eliminate federal agency oversight to protect farmers, consumers and the environment from potential harms caused by unapproved biotech crops.
• Allow Monsanto and biotech seed and chemical companies to profit by overriding the rule of law and plant their untested GMO crops despite no proof of their safety for the public and environment.

Click here to stop the Monsanto Protection Act and tell your member of Congress to stand up for your rights and the Constitution!

No matter what you believe about GMOs, the fact is that corporations should not have the right to fundamentally undermine our basic rights and constitutional freedoms in their relentless pursuit of profits. Even the consideration of this dangerous provision is a sign of just how much power Monsanto has over our federal government and how far the biotech industry will go to force its genetically engineered food on to the American public.

If allowed to pass, the Monsanto Protection Act will only open farmers and the agricultural economy to very real and significant harm from cross-contamination events. Currently, the Plant Protection Act requires the USDA to regulate GMO crops to protect “the agriculture, environment and economy of the United States”. As a result of previous lawsuits, the USDA is required to complete court-mandated environmental impact statements (EIS) prior to the sale and planting of GMO crops, but even the USDA has shown little regard for this law.

Now, the new provision set forth in the FY 2013 House Agricultural Appropriations Bill will allow biotech seed and chemical companies to openly skirt even minimal protections of human health and environmental concerns.
Fortunately, Congressman Peter DeFazio (OR-D) will introduce an amendment this week that will strike the “farmer assurance provision” currently included in the Agriculture Appropriations Bill and we need your help to make sure your member of Congress supports this important amendment to stop the Monsanto Protection Act.

Join Food Democracy Now! and our allies to help stop the Monsanto Protection Act. 

It’s time that our elected officials start putting our rights over the profits of Monsanto and biotech companies.
Thanks for participating in food democracy,

Dave, Lisa and the Food Democracy Now! Team

Postmaster General, North America

If you want your rights, your freedom and your country back, check:


www.divineprovince.org  


The following email came to me from Jeanne Ingress, candidate for Congress in District Two on the west side of New Hampshire.  Jeanne is all over the mortgage fraud going on in the  country, and will defend you from bogus foreclosures.

She is on the forward edge in matters pertaining to how to return this country to it's original common law status.

If you want to elect someone who will,  for sure, make a difference, contact Jeanne Ingress (jingresss@gmail.com), and volunteer.  She needs donations for signs and literature, and volunteers to collect 1,500 signatures for her to be on the ballot as an independent.  Even if you are not domiciled in the district, if you help her, you will help yourself.

Here is her email.

I'd say his big mistake is citing & going into court as a 14th Amendment citizen.  That makes him a citizen slave and it makes his children chattel of the state.  He should check out the following 3 inter-connected websites for an in depth explanation (as should everyone you know, including yourself):

www.divineprovince.org 

The reason for this is to take yourself out of your slave status and return to original jursidiction of the original organic constitution, valid only through the original (hidden) 13th amendment.  This is all explained in the documents, which I believe are brilliantly construed.  If you don't already have a certified copy of your birth certificate and a copy of your social security card with the red account number on it, you need to get those for yourself and your children asap, because you'll need that information to fill out the docs.

The documents to file are found on the notice-recipient site, where for $20 you can plug in your information and they will send back all the proper filings with your data filled in.  All you need to do from there is to follow the instructions, copy, paste & format everything into word docs, sign, seal and notarize where stated and send them off to all the appropriate places by certified, return-receipt-requested mail.  By doing this you are settling your account and helping to pay down the national debt (this is all explained), so the more people who do this, the quicker we will get out of being a debtor nation, and back to our sovereign status.

When the docs are completed and sent where stated, you then need to make extra copies of everything to send off to the courts and judges c/o the courts for any case you're involved in, and to any credit card companies, banks or whoever else is coming after you.  By sending this to the judge, c/o the court, it puts you into private communication with the judge wherein you stand on original jurisdiction as one of the sovereign people and can then issue your orders, and tell them what they must do ~ i.e., release your "property" (your children) back to the living status family with no further interference from the state. 

The Notice-Recipient papers will include a separate letter that goes with these additional mailings, stating that you are not the executor or the trustee, but the beneficiary of the estate, and that all accounts are now being settled.  Since you, as the beneficiary, are not qualified to speak on behalf of the estate, if they have a valid claim against you, they need to take it to probate court where all the accounts are being settled. 

I filed my papers on May Day and am now waiting for my estate to be settled.  All we're really doing is taking our asset account, which was created from our birth certificate, and moving it from one jurisdiction to another.  We're all waiting to see how this will unfold, but there is no doubt that these accounts will be settled. 

The other thing I would suggest is never to pray to the court, which could be construed as blasphemy under all these Ecclesiastical law forms, since you should only be praying to the creator.  Also, don't use the word submit.  In other words, you can file or record your papers without submitting anything because you are no longer a 14th amendment citizen slave submitting to their jurisdiction. 

It's all in the words and how they're strung together.  We need to come out of the sea of illusion and reclaim our living status and we better hurry up.

I recently saw a YouTube video of a man who was surrounded by 5 heavily armed "police" who had his child in their police car ready to be taken away. He stood there saying all the rights things, and telling the police they weren't even Americans, asking them where they were from and who they were.  He said he thought they were from Europe (but I thought they were Russians, based on what I've been learning).  The police seemed to be agreeing with everything he said, even looking sheepish and guilty in their wolf clothing, and after about 5 minutes of this, they released the child back to the father.  It was really quite stunning and a reminder to us all that we better start learning who we really are and what to say if confronted.
     
We no longer want the privileges and benefits of a slave, but all the divine rights belonging to all people everywhere.  It's a learning curve, but well worth the trouble.

Have a great day ~ jeanne.


On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Christopher King <kingjurisdoctor@gmail.com> wrote:
More to follow.

They can't hide it forever.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/06/nh-state-rep-helps-michael-holman-as-nh.html

[Christopher King, JD, from Massachusetts, is a mortgage foreclosure defender, and quite a man...]

Open Letter Re: RAPE, to Family Justice Ctr.

William-Dexter, Miller, Jr. a lawful, peaceful inhabitant, upon the land.  


Presented to: Rochester New Hampshire Police Detective Robert Frechette, Family Justice Center, Rochester, NH.

Sir,

This is an open letter, mailed Feb 27, 2013,

To Family Justice Center next Wednesday, Liz Mark at Rochester Times,

http://us.mc1201.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lmark@fosters.com, and to the people at large.

First, I accept your oath of office, whatever it says, and please present it to me, have it available with the secretary when I make another peaceable visit, along with your well thought out answers to the enclosed questions, for presentation to the people at large in Strafford County. (FOIA).

Congratulations on your recent "soft-opening" ceremony, not much publicized in Foster's, as usual, reported in Rochester Times, March 22, 2012, 150 Wakefield St., Rochester, New Hampshire.

I understand the Family Justice Center operates under a federal grant from the office of Violence Against Women, and another from Verizon.  I will have to inquire with those folks, see what they have to say about it.

I have a serial RAPIST to report, who operates under an apparent license by the Rochester Police Department.

The father of the RAPIST, former Rochester Chief of Police, David Dubois, is now running for Sheriff.

I wonder, and please respond in written fashion:  If you are now director of the Rochester Family Justice Center, dealing with domestic abuse, and RAPE, does it not logically follow that you have a background, as a detective, of investigating RAPE?

Please explain what you did or did not know about an alleged Rochester Police campaign of witness tampering against two teen-age RAPE victims.

If you knew nothing about any of this, and I know about it through street level intelligence, and the RAPE victim made not a peep about the charges being dropped, then please explain this, within the context of your career within the Rochester Police Department.

What is your official position on this?

Does it not logically follow that, based on my other documentary presentations, fairly extensive, presented to other officials and the people at large, and now to you, incorporate with this document of apprisal, that you are in a conflict of interest, and must ask the Sheriff, Wayne Estes, the New Hampshire State Police, or the FBI agent in charge in Portsmouth, all of whom are already long apprised of these matters, someone, anyone with jurisdiction, to investigate these matters?

What statistics do you have regarding the percentage of RAPES that actually get reported?  What does that say, mathmatically, about how many RAPES Brandon Dubois, of 46 Ledgeview Drive, Rochester, has actually committed, and how many, are unreported, including the original RAPE in Farmington, that led to my investigations into ROCHESTER POLICE LICENSED RAPE, in 2002.

What statistics do you have to indicate what the recidivism rate is if, on the one hand, a rapist is brought to justice, and receives extensive mandatory counseling and monitoring, as opposed to if the RAPIST, due to daddy's connections, writes a letter of apology, "not by any means an admission of guilt," and the charges are dropped, later annulled, lickity split, per order of Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, now candidate for Vice President?

What does this say about the commitment of Kelly Ayotte, the Rochester Police Department, you, Family Justice Center, the Sheriff, or anyone else in politics or law enforcement with jurisdiction and apprisal in these matters, to law, and justice for the people and for teen age RAPE victims, scared to come forward and testify???!!!!

What is your position on these matters?

[Originally written March 22, 2012.  I meant to mail or hand deliver this, but I was apprehended at gunpoint on April 5th and placed in the nuthouse in an effort to silence me--June 11, 2012].

William-Dexter Miller, Jr.

Christian Ministers, Zero For Forty

william-dexter [family Miller] House of God
general post office
near Farmington
New-Hampshire, republic


To 33 of the pastors of Strafford County, New-Hampshire:

Zero of forty pastors polled, cared at all about police licensed RAPE of teenage girls in Strafford County.

This is going out, by regular mail, to 33 ministers in Strafford County.

For an explanation see my blogs Journey of a Peace Man, and Affidavit of Truth To NH AG Michael Delaney, Oct 29, 2011, on

http://william-miller.blogspot.com.


Last summer, I phoned forty Christian ministers in Strafford County, leaving a message to inform them that I am a graduate of a distinguished Christian liberal arts college, Gordon College, Wenham, Mass., and a Desert Storm paratrooper for world peace; I have a message of grave importance to the community and spiritual leaders everywhere...

Zero of forty ministers found it necessary to call me back.

Could it be that Marx was right, in that opiates are the religion of the people?

As far as I am concerned, there is good reason I have not been in one of your comfort zone, commercialized, 501(c) corporation churches, for many years. 

I must regard you as cowards until you prove otherwise.

I am running for Sheriff, to liberate an occupied country, and defend teenage girls from police licensed RAPE.

Ref:  www.famguardian.org, www.sedm.org 

(Sovereign Education & Defense Ministry).


Lawfully,

wm-dexter Miller, Jr.


william-dexter

Ceremony to Honor Rochester Rape Camp Administrator

http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120605/GJNEWS_01/706059926&template=RochesterRegion

Rochester Police Commission to recognize retired Chief Dubois Wednesday

By LIZ MARKHLEVSKAYA

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

ROCHESTER — Retired Police Chief David Dubois will be given special recognition during the Police Commission meeting on Wednesday evening, after having served the Police Department for almost three decades.

Dubois, whose retirement officially started on Friday, was Rochester's police chief for the past 10 years. On Thursday, Michael Allen was sworn in as the new chief of the department.

On Wednesday evening, members of the Police Commission will present Dubois with a retirement badge, as well as other items that are meant to be a surprise, said Allen.

"It's the right thing to do, to honor him for the years of service," said Allen on Monday. "He has given 29 years of service to the city of Rochester — dedicated service. He served it with honor (and) integrity."

(Honor and integrity...police licensed RAPE of teenage girls, and his son, Brandon Dubois, off the hook, too easy...honor and integrity...My note, as of June 11, 2012-WDM).

Police Commission Vice Chairman Al Bemis said he expects many people, including Dubois' wife, to attend Wednesday's recognition ceremony.

"We are hoping for a great turnout," said Bemis.

Also on Wednesday, a new police officer, Charles Pendlebury, will take his oath of office. Pendlebury, 24, is expected to graduate from the state Police Academy in September.

Two recently promoted officers at the department will also take their oaths of office on Wednesday. Capt. Paul Toussaint and Deputy Chief Scott Dumas, who have been promoted from the ranks of lieutenant and captain, respectively, will be sworn in on Wednesday.

Wednesday's Police Commission meeting will wrap up with two nonpublic sessions, regarding personnel and legal matters.

The meeting will take place at 7 p.m., in the Council chambers at the City Hall.

National Economic Security and Restoration Act

I refer to NESARA in my blog, Obama's Supercongress, Newstates Constitution and the Comprehensive Hi-jacking of Your Rights, Your Freedom and Your Country

This article was itself hi-jacked from http://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com

I was incined not to believe in NESARA, but this article is compelling.

On June 6, 2012, I listened into a phone call in which it was presented that the Illuminati have put out feelers about surrendering, in exchange for their lives.  Reportedly, they know that we are onto them, and that the game is about over.

One source tells me that hundreds of international bankers have been put in jail recently.

There is a lot going on behind the scenes right now that will determine our future.

Google:  White Hat Reports

More on this later.


HISTORY OF NESARA

Posted on August 17, 2011 by Nancy B. Detweiler

HISTORY OF NESARA

The National Economic Security & Reformation Act

Compiled by Nancy Detweiler, M.Ed., M.Div.

NOTE: Writing a history of NESARA requires locating the separate dots and attempting to put them together to create truth. The original documents are sequestered and those individuals directly involved are still under a strict gag order. I have used as my foundation a history written by James Rink. My research set out to prove NESARA by locating original documents and articles written by reputable people that illustrated each of the tenets. I have inserted some of these URLs for these tenets into Rink’s history. In my 7+ years of research, I have found nothing to disprove the existence of the NESARA LAW. The internet is loaded with disinformation that can be easily dismissed by research.

Now that information regarding the government/military cover-up of the extraterrestrial presence is in the public domain, we can see parallels of the facets regarding NESARA that many have used to discredit it. Some of these are: deliberate cover-up of information, government/military gag orders, the suspicious death of persons who attempted to tell the truth, control of the media, and the ruining of individual lives and professions.

I encourage all to do your own research and add to the pool of documented evidence on the truth of NESARA.

Now is the perfect time for NESARA to be released to the world!

NESARA Demonstration in front of the Peace Palace, the Hague, Netherlands

1892 – Bankers adopted their Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892 in which it was declared: “We [the bankers] must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them….

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.”

1907-1917 – In order to warn Americans, the1892 Bankers’ Manifesto was revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917.

1910 – John E. DiNardo, professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan, writes in his article “The Federal Reserve Act”: “On the night of November 22, 1910, a small group of surrogates of the most powerful bankers of the World met … under the veil of utmost secrecy.
Over the next few weeks these men would perpetrate, under the orders of their masters, … perhaps the most colossal and devastating fraud ever inflicted upon the American People.
This ultra-secret fraud is known as the Federal Reserve Act of 1913…. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 concocted legislation, to be foisted upon the People’s Congress of the United States, that empowered and commissioned this secret cabal of World-dominant bankers to PRINT UNITED STATES CURRENCY, a usurpation of our Constitution’s explicit edict empowering ONLY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT to print and coin currency. This world banking empire used their stolen power to print, out of thin air, paper currency which, in no way represents the gold and silver reserves that authentic currency is supposed to represent.”

1913 – The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 Complete text of Act may seen at: http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/105/FRA-LH-PL63-43.pdf

1933 – 1934 – Prior to 1933, Federal Reserve Notes were backed by gold. This changed with the new law: Congressional Record, March 9, 1933 on HR 1491 p. 83. “Under the new law the money is issued to the banks in return for government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and bankers acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes, and other property of all the people of the nation.”

The Bankers’ Manifesto ties in with the U.S. Senate Document No. 43, 73^rd Congress, 1^st Session (1934), which states: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere ‘user’ and use must be in acceptance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

1970s – The Federal Land Bank illegally foreclosed on farmers mortgages all throughout the Midwest. In each of these cases the farmers were defrauded by the banks with the approval of the Federal Reserve System. These court cases would eventually become known as the Farmer Claims Program.

1978 – An elderly ranch farmer in Colorado purchased a farm with loan from the Federal Land Bank. After he died the property was passed on to his son Roy Schwasinger, Jr., who was a retired military general. Soon after a Federal Land Bank officer and Federal Marshall appeared on his property and informed him the bank was foreclosing on his farm, ordering him to vacate within 30 days. Without his knowledge, his deceased father had signed a stipulation which reverted the property back to the Federal Land Bank in the event of the borrower’s death.

Outraged, Roy E. Schwasinger, Jr. filed a class action lawsuit in the Denver Federal Court system. The suit was dismissed on the basis of incorrect filing. This prompted Roy Schwasinger’s investigation into the inner workings of the banking system.

1982 – Roy Schwasinger was given a contract by the US senate and later Supreme Court to investigate banking fraud. But because he was under a strict non-disclosure order he was not allowed to tell the media what he discovered. In the late 80s he began sharing his knowledge with others including high ranking military personnel who helped him bring about a class action lawsuit against the federal government.

The first series of these lawsuits began in the mid 1980’s when William and Shirley Baskerville of Fort Collins, Colorado were involved in a bankruptcy case with First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins; who was trying to foreclose on their farm. At a restaurant their lawyer informed them that he would no longer be able to help them and walked-off. Overhearing the conversation Roy Schwasinger offered his advice on how to appeal the case in bankruptcy court. So in 1987 they filed an appeal (Case No. 87-C-716) with the United States District Court in Colorado.

1988 – On November 3, 1988, the Denver Federal Court system ruled that indeed the banks had defrauded the Baskervilles and proceeded to reverse its bankruptcy decision. But when the foreclosed property was not returned they filed a new lawsuit. Eventually, 23 other farmers, ranchers, and Indians swindled by the banks in the same manner would join in the case.

In these cases, the banks were foreclosing on the properties using fraudulent methods such as charging exorbitant interest, illegal foreclosure, or by not crediting mortgage payments to their account as they should have but instead would steal the mortgage payments for themselves triggering foreclosure on the property. After running out of money they continued their fight without the help of lawyers. With some assistance by the Farmers Union a new lawsuit was filed against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. Case No. 92-C-1781

The District Court ruled in their favor and ordered the banks to return the stolen properties with help from either Federal Marshals or the National Guard. But when no payments were made, the farmers declared involuntary Chapter Seven Bankruptcy against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. The banks appealed their case insisting they were not a business but a federal agency therefore they were not liable to pay the damages.

So the farmer’s legal team adopted a new strategy. According to the Federal Land Bank’s 1933 charter they are not allowed to make loans directly to applicants, but instead could only back loans as a guarantor in case of default. Because the Federal Land Bank had violated this rule the farmer’s legal team was able to successfully sue the bank for damages.

Word of the lawsuit began to spread; the legal team would teach others how to fight foreclosure and to help them file lawsuits as well (Case No. 93-1308-M). Celebrities such as Willie Nelson joined in the cause and helped raise money during his “Farm Aid” concerts.

The Baskerville case had now become the Farmer Claims Class Action Lawsuit. Worried about the legal ramifications the government retaliated against the farmers by hitting them with either outrageous IRS fees, or by imprisoning the legal team under frivolous nonrelated charges. When the farmers realized they were being unfairly targeted, they had military generals such as General Roy Schwasinger sit in the courtroom to make sure the bribed judges would vote according to constitutional law.

The farmers now with a large team of knowledgeable people of the law behind them filed a new case to claim additional damages from the fraudulent loaning activities of the Farmers Credit System.
The government tried to settle but they had already lost many cases and were now loosing the appeals as well. More and more evidence was collected. According to the National Banking Act all banks are required to register their charters with the Federal and State Bureau of Records, but none of the banks complied, allowing the legal team to sue the Farmers Credit System. Not only was Farmers Credit System not chartered to do business with the American Banking Association, but so were other quasi government organizations such as the Federal Housing Administration, The Department of Housing and Urban Development, and even the Federal Reserve Bank.

The Farmers Claims lawsuit was thrown out of court at each level with the records purposely destroyed. An example of these court cases may be viewed at: http://openjurist.org/25/f3d/1055/baskerville-jb-v-federal-land-bank-na

1990s – In the early 1990’s Roy Schwasinger brought the case before the United States Supreme Court. Some of the content of this case is sealed from public eyes but most of it can be viewed today.
The U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruled that the Farmers Union claims were indeed valid, therefore, all property foreclosed by the Farmers Credit System was illegal and all those who were foreclosed on would have to receive damages. In addition, they ruled that the U.S. federal government and banks had defrauded the farmers, and all U.S. citizens, out of vast sums of money and property.
Furthermore, the court ruled the shocking truth that the IRS was a Puerto Rican Trust. Read more at: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

In addition the court ruled that the Federal Reserve was unlawful: http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10489
http://www.apfn.net/doc-100_bankruptcy27.htm

That the income tax amendment was only ratified by four states and therefore was not a legal amendment, that the IRS code was not enacted into “Positive Law” within the Code of Federal Regulations. Positive Law = Laws that have been enacted by a properly instituted and recognized branch of the government. http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/notratified.htm

That the U.S. government illegally foreclosed on farmer’s homes with help from federal agencies. Irrefutable proof was presented by a retired CIA agent. He provided testimony and records of the banks illegal activities as further evidence that the Farmers’ Union claims were indeed legitimate. The implications of such a decision were profound. All gold, silver, and property titles, taken by the Federal Reserve and IRS must be returned to the people.

The legal team sought assistance from a small group of benevolent visionaries, consisting of politicians, military generals, and business people who have been secretly working to restore the constitution since the mid 1950’s. Somehow within their ranks, a four star U.S. army general received “title” and “receiver” of the original 1933 United States Bankruptcy.

When the case was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, they ruled in his favor, giving the Army General title over the United States, Inc. Legal action was then passed on to the Senate Finance Committee and Senator Sam Nunn, who was working with Roy Schwasinger.

1991 – With the help of covert congressional and political pressure, President George H.W. Bush issued an Executive Order on Oct. 23, 1991, which provided a provision allowing anyone who has a claim against the federal government to receive payment as long as it’s within the rules of the original format of the case. You may read Executive Order No. 12778 at the URL below.
Executive Order No. 12778 Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees; October 23, 1991

http://www.doh.state.fl.us/ig/ADR/Federal_Laws/FederalExecutiveOrder.pdf

According to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, all present and succeeding debts against the U.S. Treasury must be assumed by the Federal Reserve. Thus the famer’s claims legal team was able to use that executive order to not only force the Federal Reserve to pay out damages in a gold backed currency but also allow them to receive legal ownership over the bankruptcy of United States, Inc.

To collect damages the farmers legal team used an obscure attachment to the 14th amendment which most people are not aware of. After the civil war the government allowed citizens to claim a payment on anyone who suffered damages as a result of the Federal Government failing to protect its citizens from harm or damages by a foreign government. President Grant had this attachment sealed from public eyes but somehow, someone on the farmer’s legal team got a hold of it.

If you read that carefully, it specifies damages by a foreign government. That foreign government is the corporate federal government which has been masquerading to the public as the constitutional government. 

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/813840/posts for explanations.

Remember this goes back to the Organic Act of 1871 and the Trading with the Enemies Act of 1933, which defined all citizens as enemy combatants under the federal system known as the United States. The Justices and farmer’s legal team recognized how evil and corrupt our federal government had become and to counteract this they added some provisions in the settlement to bring the government back under control.

a. First they would have to be paid using a lawful currency, backed by gold and silver as the constitution dictates. This would eliminate inflation and gyrating economic cycles created by the Federal Reserve System. See Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution.

b. Second they would be required to go back to common law instead of admiralty law under the gold fringe flags. Under common law if there is no damage or harm done then there is no violation of the law. This would eliminate millions of laws which are used to control the masses and protect corrupt politicians.

c. Lastly the IRS would have to be dismantled and replaced with a national sales tax. This is the basis of the NESARA Law.

When the legal team finally settled on a figure, each individual would receive an average of $20 million dollars payout per claim. Multiplied by a total of 336,000 claims that were filed against the U.S. Federal Government, the total payout would come out to a staggering $6.6 trillion dollars.
The U.S. Supreme Court placed a gag order on the case, struck all information from the Federal Registry, and placed all records in the Supreme Court files. Up to that point Senator Sam Nunn had kept the Baskerville Case records within his office. A settlement was agreed to out of court and the decision was sealed by Janet Reno. Because the case was sealed, claimants are not allowed to share court documents to media outlets without violating the settlement, but they can still tell others about the lawsuit. This is why you probably have not heard about this.

1991 – Roy Schwasinger went before a senate committee to present evidence of the banks and governments criminal activity. He informed them how the Corporation of the United States was tied to the establishment of a New World Order which would bring about a fascist one world government ruled by the international bankers.

1992 - A task force was put together consisting of over 300 retired and 35 active US military officers who strongly supported constitutional law.* 

This task force was responsible for investigating governmental officials, congressional officers, judges, and the Federal Reserve.

*Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jeremy Boorda

*General David McCloud

*Former Director of Central Intelligence, William Colby

They uncovered the common practice of bribery and extortion committed by both senators and judges. The criminal activity was so rampant that only 2 out of 535 members of congress were deemed honest. But more importantly they carried out the first ever audit of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve was accustomed to giving orders to politicians and had no intentions of being audited. However after they were informed their offices would be raided under military gunpoint if necessary; they complied with the 
investigation. After reviewing their files the military officers found $800 trillion dollars sitting in accounts which should have been applied to the national debt. And contrary to federal government propaganda they also discovered that most nations had in fact owed money to the United States instead of the other way around.

These hidden trillions were then confiscated and placed into European bank accounts in order to generate the enormous funds needed to pay the farmers claims class action lawsuit. Later this money would become the basis of the prosperity programs.

Despite these death blows President George H.W. Bush and the illuminati continued on with their plans of global enslavement.

1992 - In August 1992 the military officers confronted President Bush and demanded he sign agreement that he would return the United States to constitutional law and ordered him to never use the term New World Order again. Bush pretended to cooperate but secretly planned to bring about the New World Order anyway by signing an Executive Order on December 25, 1992, that would have indefinitely closed all banks giving Bush an excuse to declare martial law.
Under the chaos of martial law, Bush intended to install a new constitution which would have kept everyone currently in office in their same position for 25 years and it would have removed all rights to elect new officials. The military intervened and stopped Bush from signing that Executive order.

1993 – In 1993 members of the Supreme Court, certain members of congress and representatives from the Clinton government meet with high ranking US military officers who were demanding a return to constitutional law, reforms of the banking system, and financial redress. They agreed to create the farm claims process which would allow the legal team to set up meetings all over the country on a grass roots level to help others file claims and to educate them about the lawsuit.
A claim of harm could be made on any loan issued by a financial institution for all interest paid; foreclosures; attorney and court fees; IRS taxes or liens; real estate and property taxes; mental and emotional stress caused by the loss of property; stress related illness such as suicide and divorce; and even warrants, incarceration, and probation could also be claimed.

1994 – But the Clinton government undermined their efforts by requiring the farm claims to use a specific form designed by the government. This form imposed an administrative fee of $300 for each claim, which was later used in 1994 as a basis to arrest the leaders of the legal team including Roy Schwasinger.

The government was so afraid of what they would say during their trial in Michigan that extra steps were taken to conceal the true nature of the case. County courthouse employees were not allowed to work between Monday and Thursday during the course of the trial. And outside the courthouse, FBI agents swarmed the perimeter preventing the media and visitors from learning what was going on as well.

Harassment and retaliation by the government increased, many where sent prison or murdered while incarcerated. Despite being protected by his military personnel the army general who acquired the original 1933 Title of Bankruptcy of the United States; was imprisoned, killed, and replaced with a clone. This clone was then used as a decoy to prevent any further claims from being filed. (I am not qualified to speak on the fact of human clones; however, that they exist is a fairly widely accepted fact among those who study behind the scenes activities. You may read more at: http://www.questacon.edu.au/indepth/cloning/arguments_against_cloning.html

Don’t allow the thought of clones running the government cause you to refuse to consider the veracity of this history. As truth emerges, we will be shocked at much we hear.

During the first Clinton administration the military delayed many of Clinton’s federal appointments until they were sure these individuals would help restore constitutional law. One such individual who promised to bring about the necessary changes was Attorney General Janet Reno.

1993 – In agreement with the Supreme Court ruling on June 3, 1993, Janet Reno ordered the Delta Force and Navy Seals to Switzerland, England, and Israel to recapture trillions of dollars of gold stolen by the Federal Reserve System from the strategic gold reserves. These nations cooperated with the raid because they were promised their debts owed to the United States would be canceled and because the people who stole the money from the United States also stole money from their nations as well.

This bullion is to be used for the new currency backed by precious metals. It’s now safely stockpiled at the Norad Complex at Colorado Springs, Colorado and four other repositories. Janet Reno’s action so enraged the powers-that-be, that it resulted in her death. She was then replaced with a clone and it was this creature that was responsible for covering-up the various Clinton scandals.

To keep the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Robert Rubin in line, he too was also cloned. For the remainder of their term in office both Reno and Rubin received their salaries from the International Monetary Fund as foreign agents and not from the U.S. Treasury. Despite these actions the legal team continued on with their fight while managing to avoid bloodshed and a major revolution.

After 1993 the farmer claims process name was changed to Bank Claims. Between 1993 and 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court required U.S. citizens to file “Bank Claims” to collect damages paid by the U.S. Treasury Department. This process CLOSED in 1996.

During this time the U.S. Supreme Court assigned one or more Justices to monitor the progress of the rulings. They enlisted help of experts in economics, monetary systems, banking, constitutional government and law, and many other related areas. These justices built coalitions of support and assistance with thousands of people worldwide; known as “White Knights.” The term ‘White Knights’ was borrowed from the world of big business. It refers to a vulnerable company that is rescued from a hostile takeover by a corporation or a wealthy person—a White Knight.

To implement the required changes, the five Justices spent years negotiating how the reformations would occur. Eventually they settled on certain agreements, also known as Accords, with the U.S. government, the Federal Reserve Bank owners, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and with numerous other countries including the United Kingdom and countries of the Euro Zone. Because these U.S. banking reformations will impact the entire world; the IMF, World Bank, and other countries had to be involved. The reformations require that the Federal Reserve be absorbed by the U.S. Treasury Department and the banks’ fraudulent activities must be stopped and payment must be made for past harm.

1998 – The military generals who originally participated in the famer’s claim process realized that the US Supreme Court justices had no intentions of implementing the Accords. So they decided the only way to implement the reformations was through a law passed by congress.

1999 – A 75 page document known as the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA) was submitted to congress where it sat with little action for almost a year.

2000 – Late one evening on March 9, 2000, a written quorum call was hand-delivered by Delta Force and Navy SEALs to 15 members of the US Senate and the US House who were sponsors and co-sponsors of NESARA. They were immediately escorted by the Delta Force and Navy SEALs to their respective voting chambers where they passed the National Economic Security and Reformation Act.

These 15 members of congress were the only people lawfully allowed to hold office in accordance with the original 13th amendment. Remember British soldiers destroyed copies of the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) in the war of 1812 because it prevented anyone who had ties to the crown of England from holding public office.

NESARA is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only this country but our planet in its entire history. The act does away with the Federal Reserve Bank, the IRS, the shadow government, and much more.

NESARA implements the following changes:

1. Zeros out all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities. This is the Federal Reserve’s worst nightmare, a “jubilee” or a forgiveness of debt.

2. Abolishes the income tax.

3. Abolishes the IRS. Employees of the IRS will be transferred into the US Treasury national sales tax area.

4. Creates a 14% flat rate non-essential new items only sales tax revenue for the government. In other words, food and medicine will not be taxed; nor will used items such as old homes.

5. Increases benefits to senior citizens.

6. Returns Constitutional Law to all courts and legal matters.

7. Reinstates the original Title of Nobility amendment.

8. Establishes new Presidential and Congressional elections within 120 days after NESARA’s announcement. The interim government will cancel all National Emergencies and return us back to constitutional law.

9. Monitors elections and prevents illegal election activities of special interest groups.

10. Creates a new U.S. Treasury rainbow currency backed by gold, silver, and platinum precious metals, ending the bankruptcy of the United States initiated by Franklin Roosevelt in 1933.

11. Forbids the sale of American birth certificate records as chattel property bonds by the US Department of Transportation.

12. Initiates new U.S. Treasury Bank System in alignment with Constitutional Law

13. Eliminates the Federal Reserve System. During the transition period the Federal Reserve will be allowed to operate side by side of the U.S. treasury for one year in order to remove all Federal Reserve notes from the money supply.

14. Restores financial privacy.

15. Retrains all judges and attorneys in Constitutional Law.

16. Ceases all aggressive, U.S. government military actions worldwide.

17. Establishes peace throughout the world.

18. Releases enormous sums of money for humanitarian purposes.

19. Enables the release of over 6,000 patents of suppressed technologies that are being withheld from the public under the guise of national security, including free energy devices, antigravity, and sonic healing machines.

October 10, 2000 - Because President Clinton’s clone had no interest in signing NESARA into law on October 10, 2000; under orders from U.S. military generals, the elite Naval Seals and Delta Force stormed the White House and under gunpoint forced Bill Clinton to sign NESARA.

During this time Secret Service and White House security personnel were ordered to stand down, disarmed, and allowed to witness this event under a gag order.

From its very inception Bush Sr., the corporate government, major bank houses, and the Carlyle group have opposed NESARA. To maintain secrecy, the case details and the docket number were sealed and revised within the official congressional registry, to reflect a commemorative coin and then again it was revised even more recently. This is why there are no public Congressional Records and why a search for this law will not yield the correct details until after the reformations are made public.

Members of congress will not reveal NESARA because they have been ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to deny its existence or face charges of treason punishable by death. Some members of Congress have actually been charged with obstruction. When Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone was about to break the gag order, his small passenger plane crashed killing his wife, daughter, and himself.

If fear isn’t enough to keep Washington in line, money is. Routine bribes are offered to governmental/military officials by the power elite/secret government.

Not surprisingly, much disinformation about NESARA can be found on the internet. Wikipedia’s article is total disinformation. Dr. Harvey Francis Barnard’s NESARA bill—National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act was rejected by congress in the 1990s. Dr. Barnard was a systems philosopher and had tried for years to interest Congress in his monetary reform suggestions. A testimony by Dr. Barnard’s close friend, Darrell Anderson, may be read at: http://www.simpleliberty.org/bookshelf/draining_the_swamp.htm You may also read articles by Darrell Anderson at this site. Both men were interested in monetary reform.

September 11, 2001 – The next step is to announce NESARA to the world, but it’s not an easy task.

Many powerful groups have tried to prevent the implementation of NESARA.

The NESARA law requires that at least once a year, an effort be made to announce the law to the public. Three then current US Supreme Court judges control the committee in charge of NESARA’s announcement. These Judges have used their overall authority to secretly sabotage NESARA’s announcement.

In 2001 after much negotiation the Supreme Court justices ordered the 107^th Congress to pass resolutions approving‘ NESARA. This took place on September 9, 2001, eighteen months after NESARA became law. On September 10, 2001, George Bush Sr. moved into the White house to steer his son on how to block the announcement. The next day, on September 11, 2001, at 10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Alan Greenspan was scheduled to announce the new US Treasury Bank system, debt forgiveness for all U.S. citizens, and abolishment of the IRS as the first part of the public announcements of NESARA.

Just before the announcement at 9 am, Bush Sr. ordered the demolition of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers to stop the international banking computers on Floors 1and 2 in the North Tower from initiating the new U.S. Treasury Bank system. Explosives in the World Trade Center were planted by operatives and detonated remotely in Building 7, which was demolished later that day in order to cover-up their crime.

Remote pilot technology was used in a flyover event to deliver a payload of explosives into the Pentagon at the exact location of the White Knights in their new Naval Command Center who were coordinating activities supporting NESARA’s implementation nationwide. With the announcement of NESARA stopped dead in its tracks, George Bush Sr. decapitated any hopes of returning the government back to the people.

For the past 10 years, life in the USA, and numerous other countries, has been dictated by the staged terrorist’ attack and its repercussions. Seldom does a day go by that we do not hear mention of 9/11.
2005 – Dr. Harvey F. Barnard died on May 18, 2005. http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/newssdi?sn=Barnard&fn=Harvey&nt=exact

2009 – Roy E. Schwasinger, Jr. died on 8/23/2009 at the age of 75. Verification – Social Security Death Index at:
http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/newssdi?sn=Schwasinger&fn=Roy&nt=exact

2011 – The Debt Ceiling debacle kindled re-newed interest in NESARA. As we watch the world economy collapse, we can know that the NESARA LAW remains in the background, ready to be announced.

Share this:

• Digg
• Reddit
• Facebook739
• StumbleUpon
• Twitter88
• Email
• Print

Like this:

Like

4 bloggers like this post.

• 
• 
• 
• 

Filed under: 2011, 2012, America, Bankers, Citizen Rights, Debt Ceiling, Debt crisis, Divine Order, Divine Plan, Financial Crisis, Government, Legislation, NESARA, Peace, Politics, USA

« NESARA Rights the Unthinkable Wrongs Perpetrated On the American People & the WorldDO YOU WANT TO BE MADE WELL? »